Wanamaker Management Systems

  • Menu
  • Home
  • Agency Management
  • Services
    • Compensation
    • Approach to Rates
    • Annual Scope of Work & Staff Planning
    • Purchase Orders (POs)
    • Tactical Estimating
    • Monitoring of Hours and costs
    • Invoicing
    • Reconciliation
  • Supplier Transparency
    • Should you consider Supplier “tracking”?
    • Situation
    • What does Wanamaker ARMS capture?
    • Flexibility of ARMS
    • Import of Actuals
    • ARMS Access (security) Levels
    • ARMS Reporting Capability
    • Sample ARMS/Benchmarks Process
  • Tactical Benchmarking
    • Situation
    • Solution
    • Benchmark Questions
    • Industry Combined Tactical Benchmark System
    • Company Specific Tactical Benchmark System
  • Client/Agency Experience
  • User Resources
Home > Best In Class Processes > Annual Planning – Value of a Tactical Scope of Work

Annual Planning – Value of a Tactical Scope of Work

February 26, 2014

We are often asked, “If we need to develop an Annual Scope of Work, should there be general “buckets” of jobs or should the Annual SOW be at the tactical deliverable level?”

In our experience EVERY client/brand teams needs to present to management a budget for the year. So some type of annual planning is required.

The question then becomes…what level of detail?

We will answer it 2 ways:

  1. If the Agency/Client agreement is on a project by project basis with POs for every tactic AND Account Management is part of each tactical estimate…. then the Annual Scope of Work is a guide in order to help the brand team get funding for the year. It can then be at the level of detail required by the Brand Team and their Management.  Usually vague. Not our recommended process. But it will work assuming that each Individual Estimate is scrutinized for it total hours as well as Account Mix before opening POs.
  2. If the Agency/Client agreement is ONE Blanket PO for the year, then we highly recommend that the Annual SOW be at the tactical level. It does not need Account hours in each tactic. In Fact, there can be ONE job to capture all the Account Management hours for the year. You could force the Agency to budget their Account hours in each tactic, but do you really believe they know how many Actual hours they put toward each tactic? By providing you a full list of every tactic and the total Non Account hours you can then Benchmark each tactic as well as  the Account Mix. The Agency then has ONE PO for the year. But you still need a process of documentation  at the tactical job level. Budgets change, new jobs added, jobs removed from the Annual SOW.  This is where ARMS and Benchmarks can be a great value. You can have a negotiated Annual SOW/Blanket PO yet have the control and documentation at the individual tactical level.

Caveat: Ultimately it is the decision of the Client as to what the process will be. It may depend of their past experience, level of resources and support, implementation issues, available systems, trust of the Agencies, trust of Marketers, corporate culture.

Filed Under: Best In Class Processes

Categories

  • Announcements
  • ARMS Tutorials
  • Best In Class Processes

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Add transparency to your agency relationships. Our systems track annual/individual tactics (role/person, budget/actual, cost/hours) & compare to industry norms.

Wanamaker Management Systems

313 Blue Heron Court
Ocean City, MD 21842
info@wanamakerarms.com
610 389 4830

Connect with Us

  • Rss Feed
  • YouTube
  • Email

Copyright © 2009–2023 Wanamaker Management Systems
Privacy Policy · Site Design by Delos Incorporated